
For the drugs portion of my series, I simply intend to go on a rant.
I am not sure about how drug policy is laid out in other countries other than Canada, but here over the past few years the crime rate (with regard to drugs) has increased. My theory is not that more people are using drugs, but the government has simply decided to reprimand the use of these "illicit substances" more strictly.
What makes me especially disappointed about this whole exercise is many people are being punished for the use (and carrying) of drugs such as marijuana, but drugs such as (but certainly not limited to) the numerous (often hastily tested) pharmaceutical drugs that emerge every year in the market and alcohol (which is responsible for numerous deaths every year due to instances ranging from drunk driving to spousal abuse.
Don't get me wrong I certainly am not opposed to alcohol, as I certainly drink on a somewhat regular basis. And I am grateful for many drugs that have been brought about by the pharmaceutical industry, as they aren't all sketchy and under-tested. I do have a problem with drugs such as weed getting vilified to the 'nth degree when its affects are not dangerous in the least in comparison to many of the drugs being offered by Pfizer or Roche or Astra Zeneca or whoever.
I'm sure everyone has seen//(heard) a commercial or advertisement in a magazine for some form of depression medication. The list of side effects is often so lengthy it seems to outweigh the advertised "positive" effects. This summer my sister was using the drug called Accutane. Accutane is a acne drug patented by the pharmaceutical company Roche, with side effects ranging from dry skin to severe depression and birth defects. As I read through the numerous side effects I noticed that beside each pill that she was to take there was a small symbol. Upon its inspection I noticed that it was a woman who was pregnant with and "X" across her.
I questioned my sister about this and she said: "oh yeah, they are really intense about that. You have to be on birth control and using at least one other form of birth control because if you get pregnant, you're baby has a 90-something % chance of being all messed up." Then I asked her if she was okay with putting this drug into her body knowing this piece of information.
This drug has such an effect on your body, it is too toxic to even house a baby. So, drugs like this are readily available to those that suffer from severe acne, but medicinal marijuana is so controlled, cancer, MS, and many other patients in huge amounts of pain have to go to the greatest lengths humanly possible to acquire it just to ease their pain.
I don't get it. I feel as though this is all so clear. Drugs that are not harmful for the body should not be restricted to the public. Perhaps once again, similarly to the sex portion of this shindake it all comes down to fear mongering and education. Imagine if people didn't trust their government so much and they all weren't in bed together. But for this to change, the government will have to get out of bed with the pharmaceutical industry or at least assert some form of authority, but that will never happen.














